BMW M3 (OR) BMW 6-Series

[Bmw's_Finest]

BMW M3 (OR) BMW 6-Series 645

Which car is better.

The 2005 BMW M3 (Convertible or Coupe)

Or

The 2005 BMW 6-Series (Convertible or Coupe)



Please [headbang] ROCK THE VOTE [headbang]

 

[Tom]

M3 gets my vote.

 

[hosagod]

6 all the way.

 

[Big Daddy]

M3, although I like the 6 I like the performance of the M3 better.

 

[Militant-Grunt]

How about the M6 =D

 

[Big Daddy]

Now he did not offer that option...could change things...hmmm

 

[silvere46m3]

i rather have the m3 coupe, the convertibles get sit four adults comfortablely, the 6 coupe is actually a 2 seater.

 

[Bmw's_Finest]

How about the M6 =D

Lol i would love a m6 but if the msrp is about $99,000 at least i cant afford that. Is a convertible m3 better then a coupe. I heard the coupe is a bit faster.

 

[Chesty Bonds]

M3 if you're after a pure driving tool. The new 6 is blighted by indirect and soulless steering (because of active-steering), harsh run-flat tyres, and a silly manual gearbox setup (mainly due to CDV).

The M3's driving characteristics COMPLETELY dominate the 6er. IMO, the 6 is for oldies that want to drive long distances in comfort and at a quick pace. The M3 is for the real driving enthusiasts. In this instance, I wouldn't even consider, for one second, plumping for a 6 over an M3. It's a no-brainer really.

 

[Stitch]

I root for the M3.
The shorter the distance between the front and the rear axles, the more responsive the car will be, cause the turning radius will be short by that. Plus the shorter the entire length of the car can varies the spinning force, when the car make a shape turn at a higher speed. Of course, there are other stuffs the engineers have to look at, so that the car runs in harmony.

M3
0-60mph 5.4sec

645i
0-60mph 6.0sec